Homepage Blog Are You Charging Enough for Using NRF?

Are You Charging Enough for Using NRF?

Share

Many contractors offering Net Replacement Film (NRF) charge around £1 / €1 extra per bale compared to standard netwrap. That figure dates back to the early days of NRF but the question is, does it really cover your costs today?

When you break down the numbers, it quickly becomes clear that the “nominal” charge doesn’t match the real-world costs of running NRF.

The True Cost of NRF
  1. Machine Cost – Today and Tomorrow

Running a baler isn’t just about diesel and crop packaging materials, the capital cost matters too.

Upfront investment: Baler purchase or finance. Cost of finance over the period of full ownership.

Wear and tear: Higher bale pressures and extra cycle time from the same bale count add to long-term costs.

Future replacement: What will the next baler cost you in 3 or 5 years with finance factored in? How will your choice effect the residual value of your machine at trade in?

  1. Film Pricing

NRF film costs more per roll than netwrap and with shorter rolls and extra layers often required to compensate for the crop type/conditions, the plastic bill adds up fast.

  1. Labour Costs

Baling with NRF takes longer per bale. Slower tying cycle times and more frequent roll changes increase labour hours, which means higher wages paid for fewer bales produced per hour.

  1. Fuel Usage

More time in the field means more fuel burned. Even small delays per bale multiply into significant litres of diesel over a season.

...many contractors may be absorbing hidden costs without realising it.
Is £1/€1 Really Enough?

When you add up machine depreciation, film costs, labour, and fuel, it’s hard to see how a flat £1/€1 charge covers the real difference between NRF and netwrap. In fact, many contractors may be absorbing hidden costs without realising it.

EZ Web: A Smarter Alternative

Instead of trying to make NRF add up, contractors can turn to EZ Web, a baling solution designed to deliver efficiency and sustainability without the hidden penalties:

  • Roll lengths that reduce downtime.
  • Faster tying times compared to NRF.
  • Easier to recycle together with stretchfilm.
  • Consistent performance across all crops and conditions.
  • No additional machinery or maintenance costs.

Contractors save money, time and hassle, and customers get the eco-benefits they’re asking for.

In Summary

NRF doesn’t just put pressure on the film, it puts pressure on your bottom line. A nominal £1/€1 charge might have been enough years ago, but today’s costs prove otherwise. If you want a solution that keeps your business efficient and sustainable, EZ Web is the better answer.

To find out more about EZ Web you can read our blogs:

Not a Net or a Film; EZ Web brings new hope for sustainable round baling.

5 ways Tama EZ Web is changing the game in round baling.

Why Eco-Friendly Netwrap is the Future of Crop Baling.

Share
Skip to content